function, since it took no parameters by which to vary its decision,
and in any case it's hard to imagine a game which only
_conditionally_ wants a status bar. Changed it into a boolean data
field in the backend structure.
[originally from svn r6417]
was actually using it, and also it wasn't being called again for
different game states or different game parameters, so it would have
been a mistake to depend on anything in that game state. Games are
now expected to commit in advance to a single fixed list of all the
colours they will ever need, which was the case in practice already
and simplifies any later port to a colour-poor platform. Also this
change has removed a lot of unnecessary faff from midend_colours().
[originally from svn r6416]
Gareth managed to find an example (10x8#458168771440033 in r6289)
where running it in only one direction failed to eliminate an
obviously redundant piece of path.
[originally from svn r6290]
[r6289 == b25fcc3f2621b0b41f3ae7cdabe57ed07f62d2c2]
increment the deaths counter. In doing so, I incorrectly handled the
borderline case, so that a death incurred _in the act_ of collecting
the final gem also didn't increment the deaths counter. Now it does.
[originally from svn r6277]
to call game_set_size() twice on the same drawstate. Finally, a
definite decision: it isn't. Accordingly, midend.c arranges never to
do so, the devel docs state that puzzles may enforce by assertion
that it never happens, and the four puzzles which care (i.e. use
blitters) do so.
[originally from svn r6274]
