To do this, I've completely replaced the API between mid-end and front
end, so any downstream front end maintainers will have to do some
rewriting of their own (sorry). I've done the necessary work in all
five of the front ends I keep in-tree here - Windows, GTK, OS X,
Javascript/Emscripten, and Java/NestedVM - and I've done it in various
different styles (as each front end found most convenient), so that
should provide a variety of sample code to show downstreams how, if
they should need it.
I've left in the old puzzle back-end API function to return a flat
list of presets, so for the moment, all the puzzle backends are
unchanged apart from an extra null pointer appearing in their
top-level game structure. In a future commit I'll actually use the new
feature in a puzzle; perhaps in the further future it might make sense
to migrate all the puzzles to the new API and stop providing back ends
with two alternative ways of doing things, but this seemed like enough
upheaval for one day.
The solver's array ctx->iscratch[] is used for a completely different
purpose in the DIFF_HARD code, compared to what it's used for in
DIFF_EASY and DIFF_NORMAL. In particular, a different number of
elements of the array are used - but the code which sets up the array
was not correctly initialising all of them.
I was also unable to find any clear comment that even explained _that_
the purpose of the array was entirely different between the two cases,
let alone explaining _what_ the two purposes were. So I've written
some comments as part of this commit, which should make things a bit
less confusing next time. (Though not much, I admit.)
Draw pencil-mode cursor before corners of thick lines in order to make
the thick lines appear on top of the north-west corner of the pencil
cursor, just like they do with the non-pencil cursor.
puzzle backend function which ought to have it, and propagate those
consts through to per-puzzle subroutines as needed.
I've recently had to do that to a few specific parameters which were
being misused by particular puzzles (r9657, r9830), which suggests
that it's probably a good idea to do the whole lot pre-emptively
before the next such problem shows up.
[originally from svn r9832]
[r9657 == 3b250baa02a7332510685948bf17576c397b8ceb]
[r9830 == 0b93de904a98f119b1a95d3a53029f1ed4bfb9b3]
new_desc. Oddities in the 'make test' output brought to my attention
that a few puzzles have been modifying their input game_params for
various reasons; they shouldn't do that, because that's the
game_params held permanently by the midend and it will affect
subsequent game generations if they modify it. So now those arguments
are const, and all the games which previously modified their
game_params now take a copy and modify that instead.
[originally from svn r9830]
blocks, because 'make test' showed up very large blocks as an
occasional slowdown factor in game generation (takes too long to
iterate over all possibilities). This is a good idea in any case,
because really big multiplicative clue numbers have trouble fitting in
the square.
[originally from svn r9827]
basically just so that it can divide mouse coordinates by the tile
size, but is definitely not expected to _write_ to it, and it hadn't
previously occurred to me that anyone might try. Therefore,
interpret_move() now gets a pointer to a _const_ game_drawstate
instead of a writable one.
All existing puzzles cope fine with this API change (as long as the
new const qualifier is also added to a couple of subfunctions to which
interpret_move delegates work), except for the just-committed Undead,
which somehow had ds->ascii and ui->ascii the wrong way round but is
otherwise unproblematic.
[originally from svn r9657]
midend_status(), and given it three return codes for win, (permanent)
loss and game-still-in-play. Depending on what the front end wants to
use it for, it may find any or all of these three states worth
distinguishing from each other.
(I suppose a further enhancement might be to add _non_-permanent loss
as a fourth distinct status, to describe situations in which you can't
play further without pressing Undo but doing so is not completely
pointless. That might reasonably include dead-end situations in Same
Game and Pegs, and blown-self-up situations in Mines and Inertia.
However, I haven't done this at present.)
[originally from svn r9179]
I've decided that the extremely low density of one-option
multiplication clues is not a universally good idea after all: it
seems to me to make puzzles _quantitatively_ harder, even if Keen's
difficulty-level system can't see any difference in the set of modes
of reasoning required at least once to solve the grid.
So I've readjusted the clue selection, so that multiplicative clues
with only one workable pair of factors are restored to 'good' status
at Normal difficulty level and below, and only considered less-than-
fully-desirable at Hard and above. I think that's a reasonable
compromise.
[originally from svn r9170]
[r9165 == e7b2a9dd8d8915802fb69ce2242b1f913b7f3172]
intended behaviour of classifying multiplication clues as low-quality
if they only left one possible pair of multiplicands has never
actually worked, because I should have compared the possible clue
count against 2 rather than 1 since the multiplicands can occur either
way round.
[originally from svn r9165]
thereafter read. Most of these changes are just removal of pointless
stuff or trivial reorganisations; one change is actually substantive,
and fixes a bug in Keen's clue selection (the variable 'bad' was
unreferenced not because I shouldn't have set it, but because I
_should_ have referenced it!).
[originally from svn r9164]
state is in a solved position, and a midend function wrapping it.
(Or, at least, a situation in which further play is pointless. The
point is, given that game state, would it be a good idea for a front
end that does that sort of thing to proactively provide the option to
start a fresh game?)
[originally from svn r9140]
division clues were failing to light up as erroneous if the quotient
of the numbers in them came out right under rounded-down C integer
division (e.g. 2 and 5 would be accepted for a 2/ clue). Apparently
I copied the code that invents clues in the generator straight into
the solution checker, without remembering that the generator was
allowed to do it that way because exact divisibility had been
checked elsewhere.
[originally from svn r8951]
